Setten for EngineeringMeetings that leave tracked work behind
Planning, standups, and reviews generate decisions and follow-ups. Setten captures them as issues with owners and dates, and keeps the reasoning attached for whoever reads it in six months.
Decisions become tracked work
Turn what the team agreed in planning into issues with owners and dates, linked back to the moment it was decided.
Decision context stays with the work
Keep technical reasoning, rejected alternatives, and consensus attached to the issue, so new engineers don't relitigate settled architecture decisions.
A timeline the team can read
Read projects, phases, and dependencies in one view, and see slippage as the dates move rather than in a status meeting a fortnight later.
See what is actually blocked
Trace each task to the work upstream of it and the person who owns that work, and use standup to resolve those blockers.
Progress without a status meeting
Track velocity, workload, and delays directly from the tasks, and let the weekly update write itself.
What engineering teams get out of the box
- Spec from the conversation
- Turn a design discussion into a written spec you can edit.
- Recurring ceremonies
- Keep standups and retros as one thread, not scattered notes.
- Async for split time zones
- Read the write-up instead of attending the call.
- Stakeholder updates
- Let stakeholders on the project read progress without a separate deck.
How a planning call becomes work
- [1]
The call happens
Planning, standup, or review, recorded with no bot joining.
- [2]
Decisions get captured
What was agreed, what was rejected, and why.
- [3]
Issues open themselves
Tasks arrive with an owner, a date, and the context attached.
- [4]
Progress reports itself
The timeline and the update reflect the work as it moves.
Questions from engineering teams
Does this replace Jira or Linear?
For teams who want planning next to the conversations that drive it, yes. If you depend on deep engineering workflow tooling, keep it and use Setten for the meeting and decision record.
Why not just use a notetaker alongside our tracker?
Because the write-up ends up somewhere the tickets are not. Setten opens the issue from the decision and keeps the reasoning attached to it.
Can we keep our own workflow?
Yes. Statuses and stages are configurable to the process the team already runs.
Do people who skip the meeting still get what they need?
Yes. The write-up and the issues it opened are the record, so nobody needs a replay.
Is there an API?
Yes. Projects, tasks, and notes are all reachable programmatically.
Does it integrate with our chat and calendar?
Slack, Teams, Google Calendar, and Microsoft Calendar are supported.